Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
In the light of the principles laid down in Central Board
of Secondary Education v Aditya Bandopadhyay the examining body (the SBI in this
case) does not hold the evaluated answer sheets (in the written exam) or the assessment
sheet of the interview in a fiduciary relationship, qua the examiner/member of the
interview board.
Kumar Shanu vs Ysk Seshu Kumar, Chairman Cbse on 16 August, 2016
The aforesaid decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India CBSE and Anr. V. Aditya
Bandopadhyay was further relied in the decision pronounced on 16.08.2016 by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India in Kumar Shanu and Anr. V. CBSE in I.A. No. 01/2016 in Contempt
Petition No. 9837/2016 Civil Appeal NO.6454/2011.
Mradul Mishra vs Chairman U.P. Public Service ... on 16 July, 2018
Furthermore, in a recent decision in the matter of Mradul Mishra vs. Chairman, U.P. Public
Service Commission and Ors., Civil Appeal No. 6723 of 2018 (Arising Out of SLP No. 33006 of
2017) dated 16.07.2018, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India had while deciding the issue as to
whether the Appellant is entitled to see the answer sheets of the examination in which he
participated, held as under:
Section 8 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 22 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
1