Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.22 seconds)
- vs - on 25 July, 2011 cites

Ramesh Chand Sharma Etc vs Udham Singh Kamal And Ors on 12 October, 1999

4. It may be stated here that the applicant in para-3 of the OA has stated that this Application is filed within the period of limitation prescribed under Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. As already stated above, applicant had raised his grievance regarding his promotion since 2001, the cause of action had arisen in that year. In terms of the provisions contained in Sections 20 and 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 the OA has to be filed within a period of one year. Applicant has not placed on record any representation to suggest that he has made a representation to the authorities at the relevant time. Thus, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Ramesh Chand Sharma v. Udham Singh Kamal & Others, 2000 SCC (L&S) 53 that where the application for condonation of delay in filing the OA has not been filed and delay is not explained, neither OA can be admitted and entertained, nor delay condoned.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 159 - S P Kurdukar - Full Document
1