Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)National Institute Of Mental Health And ... vs C. Parameshwara on 13 December, 2004
Learned counsel for the revisionist has placed reliance on relevant provisions
of section 10 C.P.C. and a judgment reported in 2005(2) Supreme Court Cases
256- National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences Vs. C.
Parameshwara to strenghten his submission. According to him the subject
matter in dispute is same and the subsequent suit was not maintainable barred
by the provisions contained in section 10 C.P.C..
Suresh Kumar Bansal vs Vijay Kumar Jain on 3 February, 2005
Sri Ashish Kumar Singh has resisted the motion. He has submitted that the
two suits were entirely different. The subject matter in the two suits is entirely
different. The suit of 2004 which was preferred by the tenant was against the
alleged dispossession from the rented premises while the subsequent one was
for payment of rent and eviction of the tenant from the rented premises. He
has placed reliance on a decision of this Court reported in 2005(59) ALR 56-
Suresh Kumar Bansal Vs. Vijay Kumar Jain.
1