Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.39 seconds)
Anil Kumar Mishra Aged About 42 Years Son ... vs Union Of India on 8 April, 2011 cites

Madan Lal vs State Of J&K on 6 August, 1997

The entire procedure is also obviously illegal. It is true, as contended by Shri Madhava Reddy, that this Court in Madan Lal v. State of J&K2 and other decisions referred therein had held that a candidate having taken a chance to appear in an interview and having remained unsuccessful, cannot turn round and challenge either the constitution of the Selection Board or the method of selection as being illegal; he is estopped to question the correctness of the selection. But in his case, the Government have committed glaring illegalities in the procedure to get the candidates for examination under the 1955 Rules, so also in the method of selection and exercise of the power in taking out from the purview of the Board and also conduct of the selection in accordance with the Rules. Therefore, the principle of estoppel by conduct or acquiescence has no application to the facts in this case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 320 - G N Ray - Full Document

Raj Kumar & Ors. Etc vs Shakti Raj & Ors. Etc on 11 February, 1997

19. Thus, whether the applicants who could not qualify in the selection could agitate or not rests in the fact whether the alleged lacuna and irregularities eclipse the normal rule that the failed cannot challenge the selection and the ratio in the case of Raj kumar (supra) would apply. If the allegations as itemized in one of the preceding paragraphs i.e. Number of vacancies earmarked for reserved candidates, clubbing of vacancies, etc., are found true concurrently, they would give passport to the applicants to challenge the selection.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 138 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

A. Janardhana vs Union Of India And Others on 26 April, 1983

In so far as the non joinder of parties is concerned, the decision by the Apex court in A Janardhana vs Union of India (1983) 3 SCC 601 had been referred to. Therein, no relief was claimed against any individual. The only relief which was claimed therein was against the Union of India. The question which was raised therein was a question of interpretation. It was in the aforementioned situation, this Court held that all the employees were not required to be impleaded as a party. In that case, the case of direct recruits has not gone unrepresented. It was stated:
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 238 - D A Desai - Full Document

R. K. Sabharwal And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 10 February, 1995

20. There are in all 273 vacancies of Goods Pilots which are sought to be filled with due reservations catered for as per the rules. Admittedly the extent of distribution of vacancies to General, reserved for SC and reserved for ST for the said 273 vacancies should have been respectively 213, 40 and 20 whereas, the distribution adopted had been to the extent of 201, 59 and 13 respectively. The constitution Bench of the Apex Court in the case of R.K. Sabharwal vs State of Punjab (1995) 2 SCC 745 in para 4 thereof, discussed about the necessity to follow strictly the percentage of reservation. Of course, the orientation therein is whether there could be curtailment in reservation on the ground that sufficient number of reserved candidates have already been available against certain general vacancies.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 786 - K Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next