Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.21 seconds)The Delhi Prevention Of Defacement Of Property Act, 2007
Hiralal D. Karnavt @ ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 December, 2019
5. Based thereon, Mr. J.R. Sharma submitted that the essential
ingredients of Section 3 of the DPDP Act are not satisfied, inasmuch as
there is no allegation of defacement by writing or marking with ink, chalk,
paint or any other material. The learned counsel placing reliance upon a
decision dated 17.09.2008 of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in T.S.
Marwah & Ors. vs. State in CRL.M.C.1920/2008, while dealing with a
pari-materia provision, wherein it was held that mere putting up of a
banner would not fall within the ambit of Section 3(1) of the West Bengal
Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 1976, submitted that the FIR
calls for quashing.
1