Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.39 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 9 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Rajendra Prasad Boso vs Gopal Prasad Sen on 26 June, 1930
An appeal was carried to Privy Council against this decision of the Patna High Court Rajendra Prasad v. Gopal Prasad, AIR 1930 PC 242 (Q) and their Lordships of the Judicial Committee assumed the document to be admissible and did not decide the question at all.
Musammat Subhani vs Nawab on 17 August, 1940
(4) By particular instances by which the custom was claimed, recognised, or exercised, or knowledge of its exercise was disputed, asserted or departed from. It must be remembered in this connection as has been held by the Privy Council in Mt. Subhani v. Nawab, AIR 1941 PC 21 (S), and reiterated by the Supreme Court in Gokal Chand v. Parwin Kumari, 1952 SC 331: (AIR 1952 SC 231) (T) that, the English rule that "a custom in order that; it may be legal and binding must have been used so long that the memory of man runneth not to contrary" should not be strictly applied to Indian conditions.