Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.41 seconds)
State Of Jharkhand vs Vikash Sharma @ Gulla & Anr on 8 December, 2010 cites

Machhi Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab on 20 July, 1983

35. Learned counsel cited the cases of Sobhit Chamar Vs State of Bihar [1998 SCC(3) 455]; Shiv Ram Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ( 1998 SCC (1) 149 ); Prajeet Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar (2008(4) JT 257 = 2008(4)SCC 434); State of U.P. Vs Sattan @ Satyendra ( 2009 JT (4) 437 ) and the case of Sunil Baban Pingale Vs. State of Maharashtra( 1999(5) SCC 702 ).The rulings cited by the learned counsel of the complainant are mainly based on the judgments in the case of Bachan Singh (supra) and Machhi Singh ( supra).We have discussed in detail the principles laid down in those judgments. Each case has to be adjudged from its own facts and circumstances. The rulings which have been cited by the learned counsel are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 785 - M P Thakkar - Full Document

Bachan Singh Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab Etc. Etc on 16 August, 1982

35. Learned counsel cited the cases of Sobhit Chamar Vs State of Bihar [1998 SCC(3) 455]; Shiv Ram Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ( 1998 SCC (1) 149 ); Prajeet Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar (2008(4) JT 257 = 2008(4)SCC 434); State of U.P. Vs Sattan @ Satyendra ( 2009 JT (4) 437 ) and the case of Sunil Baban Pingale Vs. State of Maharashtra( 1999(5) SCC 702 ).The rulings cited by the learned counsel of the complainant are mainly based on the judgments in the case of Bachan Singh (supra) and Machhi Singh ( supra).We have discussed in detail the principles laid down in those judgments. Each case has to be adjudged from its own facts and circumstances. The rulings which have been cited by the learned counsel are not applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 112 - Cited by 863 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 3 Next