Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.60 seconds)
Baldev Singh And Anr. vs Smt. Vidya Devi And Anr. on 4 April, 1991 cites

The Oriental Fire And General Insurance ... vs Matta Chandra Rao And Anr. on 18 October, 1986

The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Ltd. v. Matta Chandra Rao, (1987) 2 A.C.C. 28, Vivek Kumar v. Kasturabai, (1987) 2 A.C.C. 362, and Hullanbai v. Jagdish Prasad, 1991 A.C.J. 198, for the proposition that if a labourer is engaged for leading and unloading of the truck, the Insurance Company is liable He has also invited my attention to the policy, Annexure P/2, according to which six labourers are allowed. He further submits that the labourer had died.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 35 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

Vivek Kumar vs Kasturabai And Ors. on 15 July, 1987

The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Ltd. v. Matta Chandra Rao, (1987) 2 A.C.C. 28, Vivek Kumar v. Kasturabai, (1987) 2 A.C.C. 362, and Hullanbai v. Jagdish Prasad, 1991 A.C.J. 198, for the proposition that if a labourer is engaged for leading and unloading of the truck, the Insurance Company is liable He has also invited my attention to the policy, Annexure P/2, according to which six labourers are allowed. He further submits that the labourer had died.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Hullanbai And Ors. vs Jagdish Prasad And Ors. on 8 February, 1990

The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Ltd. v. Matta Chandra Rao, (1987) 2 A.C.C. 28, Vivek Kumar v. Kasturabai, (1987) 2 A.C.C. 362, and Hullanbai v. Jagdish Prasad, 1991 A.C.J. 198, for the proposition that if a labourer is engaged for leading and unloading of the truck, the Insurance Company is liable He has also invited my attention to the policy, Annexure P/2, according to which six labourers are allowed. He further submits that the labourer had died.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Indian Insurance Companies' ... vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Rattan ... on 11 November, 1968

3. Mr. Munishwar Puri, Advocate, counsel for the appellant, has strongly contended that the finding for the Tribunal recorded in para 25 of the judgment in so far as it holds that the Insurance Company is not liable to pay is erroneous in law. He has also drawn my attention to the finding of the Tribunal that the deceased labourer was to unload the goods at the destination. It means that the deceased was working for the owner of the truck. Mr. Munishwar Puri relied upon the decisions of this Court reported as M/s. United India Insurance Co. v. Rattan Singh, (1987-2)92 P. L. R. 518.
Madras High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1