Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.34 seconds)
Union Of India vs The Registrar on 18 March, 2015 cites

The Union Of India vs Smt. Leelamma on 29 January, 2014

5. Therefore, some of them approached the Central Administrative Tribunals, Bangalore Bench and Chennai Bench and filed applications. The applications were allowed and the Department of Telecommunications filed an appeal before the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.10692 of 1995. The said appeal filed by the Union of India represented by the Ministry of Communications along with other appeals were dismissed by the Supreme Court by a common order dated 9.10.2002 (Union of India Vs. Leelamma Jacob & Others). It is relevant to note that after the filing of the appeal by the Union of India in the year 1995, but before the Supreme Court passed orders on 9.10.2002, the BSNL was already born on 1.10.2000.
Karnataka High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 8 - L N Swamy - Full Document

State Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. Etc. Etc vs G. Sreenivasa Rao & Ors. Etc. Etc on 13 March, 1989

27. But unfortunately, the said decision has no application to the facts of the present case. We are not concerned in this case with a claim for equal pay for equal work. We are concerned in this case with a claim by persons, who passed departmental examination and gained promotion much before the scheme was introduced and whose juniors were allowed to score a march merely because they stagnated in the lower post without being able to pass the test.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 77 - K Singh - Full Document

United India Insurance Company Ltd vs Ibrahim on 13 July, 2010

28. The next decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners in Union of India Vs. Ibrahim Munon [2010 (15) SCC 727], no doubt arose out of OTBP as well as BCR schemes. But, as seen from paragraph 6 of said decision, the case related to persons, who were transferred on their own request to another division and who became junior most in that division. Therefore, the said decision is also of no assistance to the petitioners.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1