Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)Article 310 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Subodh Ranjan Ghosh vs Major N.A.O. Callaghan And Anr. on 1 June, 1956
fS) AIR 1955 Cal 56, Subhodh Ranjan Ghosh v. Major N.A.O. Callaghan, AIR 1956 Cal 532 and Dass Mal v. Union of India, AIR 1956 Punj 42. It is, therefore, clear that as the language of Article 311 indicates, the appellant is beyond the purview of the said Article.
The High Commissioner For India And The ... vs I.M. Lall on 18 March, 1948
In P. Joseph John v. State of Trav-Co., (S) AIR 1955 S.C. 360, their Lordships of the Supreme Court approving of the Privy Council decision in High Commissioner for India v. I. M. Lall, 75 Ind App 225: (AIR 1948 PC 121) held that the opportunity to show cause ought to be given alter the guilt of the employee is determined and a provisional punishment is proposed.
Government of India Act, 1935
The Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850
Nagendra Kumar Roy, Assistant ... vs Commrs. For The Port Of Calcutta And Ors. on 8 March, 1954
6. But Article 310 of the Constitution empowers the President to frame service rules or regulations and a person who is not entitled to the protection of Article 311 may be entitled to benefit conferred by the service rules or the regulations. The learned Judges of the Calcutta and Punjab High Courts took this view in Nagendra Kumar Roy v. Commrs. for the Port of Calcutta.
1