Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 36 (0.26 seconds)Shashi Kumar Banerjee & Ors vs Subodh Kumar Banerjee Since Deceased & ... on 13 September, 1963
58. Ld. counsel for petitioner has relied upon Shashi Kumar
Banerjee Vs. Subodh Kumar Banerjee, 1963, Law Suit (SC)
191, decided on 13.09.1963; in support of handwriting expert
evidence led by the petitioner. I have perused the same. The
judgment is on its own facts and not applicable in the case in
hand. Neither I have not relied upon the opinion of either of the
finger print experts.
Section 68 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 59 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 63 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Mahesh Kumar (D) By Lrs vs Vinod Kumar & Ors on 13 March, 2012
44. Following the above rulings, the Supreme Court in Mahesh
Kumar (dead) by LRs Vs. Vinod Kumar & Ors., (2012) 4 SCC
387, held, in the facts and circumstances of the said case that
the evidence unmistakably showing that the objectors had
separated from the family, taking their respective shares, not
bothering to look after the parents in their old age, there was
"nothing unatural or unusual" in the decision of the testator ( the
father) to give his share in the joint family property to the son
who, along with his wife and children, had taken care of the
parents, adding that :-
Hari Singh & Anr. vs The State & Anr. on 3 December, 2010
In Hari Singh & Anr Vs. The State & Anr. 2010 ( 120) DRJ
716, a division bench of this Court, after noting the law
declared, inter alia, in Uma Devi Nambiar (supra), observed
thus:-
Maya Devi (D) By Lrs vs Raj Kumari Batra (D) By Lrs. & Ors on 8 September, 2010
46. Naveen Bhatia through LRs, Vs. Raj Kumari Bhatia & Ors.
Smt. Radhamma And Ors. vs H.N. Muddukrishna And Ors. on 7 November, 2005
Anvar P.V vs P.K.Basheer & Ors on 18 September, 2014
v. Anvar P.V. Vs. P.K. Basheer & Ors. (2014) 10 SCC 473;