Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.37 seconds)
Hrd Corporation (Marcus Oil And ... vs Gail (India) Limited (Formerly Gas ... on 31 August, 2017
cites
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 48 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
H.G.Rangangoud vs M/S State Trading Corp.Of India L.& Ors on 11 November, 2011
25. The fact that Justice Doabia has already rendered an award in
a previous arbitration between the parties would not, by itself, on the
ground of reasonable likelihood of bias, render him ineligible to be an
arbitrator in a subsequent arbitration. As has been stated in H. v. L &
others, [2017] 1 W.L.R. 2280 at 2288-2289:
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
Section 28(3) has also been amended to bring it in line with the
judgment of this Court in Associate Builders (supra), making it clear
that the construction of the terms of the contract is primarily for the
arbitrator to decide unless it is found that such a construction is not a
possible one.
Section 28 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Renusagar Power Co. Ltd vs General Electric Co on 7 October, 1993
“Fundamental policy of Indian law” is now to
be understood as laid down in Renusagar (supra).