Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.38 seconds)

Vinod Kumar And Anr. vs Sat Pal on 27 October, 2004

6. The cases cited by counsel for both sides are brought out only for rendering a comprehensive judgment. The counsel for the revision petitioner refers to a decision in Vinod Kumar and others Vs. Sat Pal 2005 (1) PLR 492 to the effect that without proof of factual parting with possession to the sub tenant, the case of sub- tenancy itself could not be said to be established.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 3 - N K Sud - Full Document

Ashwani Kumar Prasher And Anr. vs Anil Kapoor on 1 July, 2004

The learned Senior Counsel for the respondent refers to a decision of this Court in Ashwani Kumar Prashar and another Vs. Anil Kapoor 2004 (2) RCR 174 that when a tenant transferred his own business to another town and handed over the possession of demised premises to his brother without permission of landlord, it could be presumed that possession had been transferred for some consideration.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1