Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (0.44 seconds)
W.Rajan D. Yesudian vs G.Jeyachandran Devasahayam on 17 December, 2020 cites

D. Chelliah Nadar And Anr. vs G. Lalitha Bai And Anr. on 21 July, 1976

19. But in the instant case, these exceptions will not apply as the law prevailing at that point of time was rightly applied in consonance with the statutes and the subject matter in issue in the previous Suit and the present Suit are one and the same. The parties who are claiming right under the parties in the previous Suit. Therefore, the principles of res-judicata will apply even the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in D.CHELLYAH NADAR VS. G.LETHA BAI [1977 (1) MLJ 451] was held to be erroneous in a subsequent proceedings. As far as the decree and judgment between the parties in O.S.No.66/1975 has 24/40 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS (MD) NO.87 OF 2019 become final, it will operate as res-judicata and subsequent development will not give a fresh cause of action action to the parties.
Madras High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Satyendra Kumar & Ors vs Raj Nath Dubey & Ors on 6 May, 2016

25. The learned counsel for the appellant relied on a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SATYENDRA KUMAR AND OTHERS VS. RAJ NATH DUBEY AND OTHERS [AIR 2016 SC 2231 = 2016 (14) SCC 49]. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has categorically held that the erroneous determination of pure question of law in a previous judgment 38/40 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis AS (MD) NO.87 OF 2019 will not operate as res-judicata in a subsequent proceeding for different property, though between the same parties.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 31 - S K Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 Next