Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.41 seconds)Mohammad Ismail vs The State Of Karnataka And Ors. on 2 August, 1984
25. Coordinate bench of this Court following the
judgments of Apex Court with regard to levy of cost in the
case of Mohammad Ismail vs. The State of Karnataka and
others reported in AIR 1985 Kar. 123 to the following
effect:
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Ila Vipin Pandya vs Smita Ambalal Patel on 17 May, 2007
24. As already observed hereinabove, 1st
defendant herein has been successful in preventing the
plaintiffs from enjoying the fruits of decrees obtained by
her from the competent Civil Courts by not only filing
suit after suit but also obtaining interim orders by using
trick and stratagem and as such it has to be examined as
to whether appellants are required to be mulcted with
cost in the present appeal. The fact that cost should
follow the cause is the normal course and the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of Ila Vipin Pandya Vs. Smita
Ambalal Patel reported in 2007 (6) SCC 750 has held as
under:
1