Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.33 seconds)The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Kali Ram vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 24 September, 1973
5. The power of the Appellate Court to unsettle the order of
acquittal on the basis of re-appreciation of the evidence is subject to the settled
law that where two views are possible and out of the two, one points towards the
innocence of the accused, the view which favours the accused should prevail
over the other pointing towards his guilt. Furthermore, the trial Court has the
additional advantage of closely observing the prosecution witnesses and their
demeanour, while deciding about the reliability of the version of prosecution
witnesses. (See H.D. Sundara and others vs. State of Karnataka, Criminal
Appeal No.247 of 2011 decided on 26.09.2023; Kali Ram vs. State of H.P., 1973
(2) SCC 808, Chandrappa and others vs. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC
415 and Hari Ram vs. State of Rajasthan (2000) 9 SCC 136).
State Of Haryana vs Ankit And Others on 6 July, 2023
A Division bench
of this Court in the judgment passed in State of Haryana vs. Ankit and others
passed CRM-A No.3 of 2022 decided on 06.07.2023 has held that presumption of
innocence further gets entrenched on the acquittal of accused by the trial Court.
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
1