Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.19 seconds)Section 332 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 353 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of T.Nadu Tr.Insp.Of Police vs N Suresh Rajan & Ors on 6 January, 2014
8. On the other hand, counsel for the accused person has opposed the same and has argued that the
offence is not proved against the accused persons. It is stated that PW-2 Manoj and PW-11 Pawan were
FIR no. 56/07
State Vs. Suresh
PS: Kapashera Page 3 of 7
declared hostile by Ld. APP, as they had resiled from their previous statements. Further PW-11 Pawan
Pratihast and PW-12 Rohit Ranjan could not identify accused persons in the Court. Hence, they do not
support the prosecution case and a benefit of doubt should be given to the accused persons. Further, it
is stated that the accused persons have been falsely implicated by the said witnesses. Actually, they
came at the spot and when they were asked to show their I-cards, they could not show the same and
fled away from the spot. Thereafter, they implicated the accused persons in the present case. This fact
has been proved by the testimony of DW-1 Ramesh Chand.