Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)
Sunil Bhusan Raha vs Calcutta State Transport Corporation & ... on 29 July, 1998 cites

Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994

10. The very fact that the petitioner could not satisfy the authority as to why he withheld the said purported ceritificate dated 1.4.35, is not under challenge, nor can be subject matter of the wirt application. The same by itself clearly demonstrates the conduct of the petitioner to the effect that he wanted an appointment as a major although he was minor at that point of time. It is now a well settled principles of law that when a decision had been taken by an administrative authority, this court in exercise of its power of judicial review could not enter into the merit of the decision, but in such a situation this Court is only concerned with the decision making process, and in a given situation, may, set aside the order if the same suffers from illegality, irrationality or procedural irregularity. No such illegality, irrationality or procedural irregularity has been pointed out. and in that view of the matter, this is case where this court should not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction. Reference in this connection may be made to Tata Cellular v. Union of India & Ors.. .
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 3275 - S Mohan - Full Document
1