Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.84 seconds)Section 326 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Bahadur Naik vs State Of Bihar on 11 May, 2000
In the case of Bahadur Naik v. State of Bihar , it was held that non-examination of an Investigating Officer was of no consequences when it could not be shown as to what prejudice had been caused to the appellant by such non-examination.
Section 342 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 450 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Shyam Sunder Prasad Singh & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 22 July, 1980
(iii) He would further rely upon the decision reported in 2001 SCC (Cri) 1546 (Ram Gulam chaudhary and others v. State of Bihar) and submitted that where there were several witnesses who had given credible and believable evidence regarding place of occurrence, held, their evidence cannot be discarded merely because the investigating officer had not been examined when in the circumstances of the case the investigating officer could not have given any evidence as to the actual place of occurrence. So non-examination of investigating officer had not caused any prejudice to the accused/appellants. Hence, it is not fatal to the case of prosecution. It is appropriate to incorporate para-25 to 30, which are extracted hereunder: