Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)Collector Of Central Excise, Vadodra vs Rohit Pulp Paper Mills on 30 April, 1998
In view of the objection raised by the Respondent's Counsel and following the ratio of the Supreme Court decision referred to above, we find lot of force on the arguments advanced on behalf of the respondents. We find that authorization is not in proper form since, 35E (2) relates to filing and appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). In view of this position, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.
Section 35 in The Central Excise Act, 1944 [Entire Act]
1