Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.27 seconds)
Tilak Raj Bhasin & Anr vs Dalip Kumar Ahuja on 31 October, 2023 cites

Mrs. Rena Drego vs Lalchand Soni, Etc on 5 March, 1998

In Rena Drego v. Lalchand Soni [(1998) 3 SCC 341] it was observed that in the light of the factual position in that case, "when the landlady says that she needs more accommodation for her family, there is no scope for doubting the reasonableness of the requirement". It was held that the circumstances of the case raised a presumption that the requirement was bona fide and that "tenant has failed to show that the demand for eviction was made with any oblique motive". It was held that in the absence of such evidence by the tenant, the presumption of the bona fide need stood unrebutted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 150 - Full Document

Mehmooda Gulshan vs Javaid Hussain Mungloo on 17 February, 2017

44. As regards, the non-examination of Sh. Yatin Bhasin is concerned, the learned ARC has failed to appreciate the law laid down by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court that non-examination of the person on whose the bonafide need the eviction petition is predicated, is not necessary to Digitally Signed RC.REV. 63/2017 Page 19 of 24 By:AMIT ARORA Signing Date:01.11.2023 12:00:50 enter the witness box, reliance is placed on Mehmooda Gulshan (Supra). PW1 entering the witness box has been able to establish the genuine and bonafide need. In his cross examination, he has volunteered that his son Yatin Bhasin would start a consultancy business in the tenanted premises.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 28 - Full Document
1   2 Next