Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.24 seconds)The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000
Suhani Chaurasiya And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 27 January, 2021
24. Apart from relying upon Aadhar Card, medical report and decision of Apex Court in case of Suhani & another (supra), nothing was placed before the Court by the petitioners to substantiate their claim as far as the age of petitioner No.2 is concerned. Thus, once the High School certificate has been brought on record, which having not been denied or challenged by petitioner No.2, no question arises for considering the medico-legal evidence or Aadhar Card for determining the age of the girl.
Jarnail Singh vs State Of Haryana on 1 July, 2013
Moreover, the Court had not taken note of the decision of Jarnail Singh's case (supra).
Md.Ali @ Guddu vs State Of U.P on 10 March, 2015
19. The air has been cleared by Apex Court in case of Jarnail Singh (supra) as well subsequent Division Bench judgments of this Court in case of Nisha Naaz alias Anuradha and Another (supra); Smt. Priyanka Devi (supra) and Ali Mohammad (supra) that medico-legal examination of a girl can only be conducted and relied upon once there is a doubt to a High School Certificate, otherwise the medico-legal test report cannot be looked into in view of Section 94 of the Act, 2015.
Smt. Priyanka Devi vs State Of U.P. And 4 Ors. on 21 November, 2017
19. The air has been cleared by Apex Court in case of Jarnail Singh (supra) as well subsequent Division Bench judgments of this Court in case of Nisha Naaz alias Anuradha and Another (supra); Smt. Priyanka Devi (supra) and Ali Mohammad (supra) that medico-legal examination of a girl can only be conducted and relied upon once there is a doubt to a High School Certificate, otherwise the medico-legal test report cannot be looked into in view of Section 94 of the Act, 2015.