Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.99 seconds)
State vs . Parveen Kumar on 12 September, 2022 cites

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Satish Kumar Jhaleriya 18 Fa/309/2018 ... on 24 July, 2019

1. Vide this order the present case filed by the prosecution against MLA Praveen Kumar (hereinafter accused) u/s 3 of The State v. Parveen Kumar FIR No.50/2020, PS Lajpat Nagar page no. 1 of 19 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 2007 (DPDP Act) shall be decided and disposed off. Section 3 of the DPDP Act provides for penalty for defacement of property. The meaning of defacement and law related to it shall be discussed in detail in the later pages of this judgment.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 74 - Full Document

M/S Delhi Outdoor Advertisers ... vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors on 2 September, 2016

Further, in the judgments titled as Colonel Shiv Raj Kumar vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and others [CWP No.3367/2015 decided on 28.02.2018] as well as Indian Outdoor Advertising Association vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Others [WP (C), 4238/2015 decided on 06.05.2015], directions were given for invoking the provisions of the DPDP Act against such banners/posters which cause defacement.
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 8 - I Kaur - Full Document
1   2 Next