Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.41 seconds)

State (Delhi Administration) vs Smt. Kuldeep Kaur And Anr. on 24 April, 2006

The testimony of PW4 SI Vikram Singh has remained unrebutted as PW4 was not cross­examined by the appellant though opportunity was granted to him. Trial court rightly took judicial notice of the fact that a passport is issued on the basis of the application submitted by an applicant and the applicant is supposed to furnish all the information correctly for the issuance of the passport. From the evidence on record it has been established that appellant knowingly and dishonestly cheated the Crl. Appeal No. 58.10 Page 4/5 passport/immigration authorities by concealing material facts as discussed hereinabove. There is no dispute regarding the legal proposition as laid down in judgment Kuldeep Kaur (supra). In my opinion, prosecution has proved its case against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 10 - M Goel - Full Document
1