Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 38 (0.26 seconds)The National Security Act, 1980
Section 19 in The Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The National Security Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The National Security Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
The Advocates Act, 1961
Preventive Detention Act, 1950
Section 17 in The National Security Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
Raisuddin @ Babu Tamchi vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr on 7 October, 1983
8. The first point which requires consideration although not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Raisuddin alias Babu Tamchi v. The State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1984 SC 46 is that what should be the meaning of the words 'place before' the Advisory Board as used under section 19 of the Act.
Anant Sakharam Raut & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr. Etc on 14 November, 1986
In the cases of Anant Sakharam Raut v. State of Maharashtra and Leena Anant Raut v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1987 SC 137, which were under the National Security Act, it has been found that there was absolutely no mention in the order about the fact that the petitioner was under-trial prisoner, that he was arrested in connection with three cases, that applications for bail were pending and that he was released on three successive days in three cases which indicated a total absence of application of mind on the part of the detaining authority while passing the orders of detention. On this ground alone the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and the petition.