Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.24 seconds)Section 33 in The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Dattatraya Krishna Jangam vs Jairam Ganesh Gore on 4 September, 1964
A) Whether Second Appeal No.346 of 2021 is maintainable
in view of Dattatraya Krishna Jangam vs Jairam Ganesh Gore,
reported in AIR 1965 Bombay 177 ?
The Delhi Rent Act, 1995
Section 41 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Sultan And Ors. vs Ganesh And Ors. on 9 February, 1988
Further,
reliance has been placed on Sultan and others vs. Ganesh and
others, reported in AIR 1988 Supreme Court 716, wherein it has
been held that,
"In a suit for declaration of title and possession filed
by the plaintiff who claimed to have purchased the
premises, the defendant who was in possession,
claimed title by adverse possession against the
vendor. The defendant never raised the plea that he
was the tenant of the vendor and on the contrary
denied the relationship of landlord and tenant. The
plaintiff had also claimed a decree for mesne profits
and rent. The decree for possession and rent was
passed by the lower Courts......."
A.H. Mistry & Co vs Awadh Narayan Singh Shiv Nayak Singh on 19 July, 2010
Further, reliance has been placed on the decision in A. H. Mistry &
Co. vs. Awadh Narayan Singh Shiv Nayak Singh & Ors., reported in
2010 (6) Bom.C.R. 469, which is also on the same line as to when
only one of the co-owner agrees to sell the property then the
contract will not be binding on the other co-owners.
1