Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (1.15 seconds)Satnarain Dube vs Narain Bargah And Ors. on 16 July, 1915
2. The accused in this case are the daughter, son-in-law and the daughter's son of one Mt. Budhia. who was one of the wives of one Bhairon. "Bhairon had lent money to some one, and in execution, of the decree obtained by Bhairon the house, which is the subject, of the dispute, was purchased by Budhia, and her name appeared in the sale certificate. Mr. Todar Mal and his colleague Mr. J.C. Kapur with reference to the dakhalnamah have said 'as the original is' not produced we need make no comment upon it. This on the face of it is ridiculous. It has been held by a Bench of this Court in Satnarain Dube V. Narain Bargah [1915] 13 A. L, J. 935 that a dakhalnamah is a public document and its copy is admissible without proof and that was in the year 1915. That law has not been changed since then.
1