Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.95 seconds)Section 24 in The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
J.H. Irani And Ors. vs T.S. Pl. P. Chidambaran Chettiar And ... on 27 July, 1951
18. Mr. Hattangadi also relied on the decision of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court in G. H. Irani v. Chidambaran Chettiar, , a case under the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, where the Head Note, so far as is relevant, reads as follows (all pp. 654, 655, 658 of AIR):--
Lakhmichand Khetsey Punja vs Ratanbai And Ors. on 11 October, 1926
26. Mr. Vyas also referred to a decision of this Court En Lakhmichand Khatsey Punja v. Ratanbai, 29 Bom LR 78 (AIR 1927 Bom 115), which was only a case where the cause of action was damages for negligence In repairing the privies; and hence it was held that the common, privies In a Bombay chawl were used by the tenants as licensees, and the landlords are bound to repair them so as to keep them reasonably safe for the tenants and that cannot, in any way, help us in interpreting the rights of the tenants arising under the special provisions of the Bombay Rent Act passed many years later in the light of the experience which the legislature had about the conflicting Interests and attitudes of landlords and tenants in overcrowded cities and towns,
Section 108 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 23A in The Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
1