Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.23 seconds)

Jitendra Kumar Singh & Anr vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 8 January, 2010

17. Therefore, it is held that since the applicants No. 1 to 5, who belong to reserved category, availed relaxation in educational qualification and weightage in marks on account work experience in the same department, at par with the candidates of general category, so they are also entitled to be considered on merits, for the post of MTS, in general category, as no extra special benefit was availed by the reserved category candidates. The contrary arguments of learned counsel for the respondents and the contrary observations made in Madan Lals, Deepas and Suresh Pals case (supra), stricto sensu, deserve to be and are hereby repelled. On the contrary, the ratio of law laid down in the indicated judgment of Jatindra Kumar Singh case (supra) is mutatis mutandis applicable to the present controversy and is a complete answer to the problem in hand.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 368 - S S Nijjar - Full Document

Suresh Chand Sri Gopal vs The Union Of India on 21 September, 1988

2015 (4) KLT 32 and this Tribunal in the case of Suresh Pal & Others Vs. Union of India & Others in O.A. No. 060/00476/2015 decided on 09.12.2016, are at all applicable to the facts of the present case, wherein the crux of law laid down was that if a candidate has availed the special benefit of additional experience, which was not availed by the general category candidate, then he has to be considered for vacancy in their own category and cannot slip into general category, on the basis of additional marks given to them for this weightage regarding experience.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 50 - Cited by 8 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Madan Lal vs The State Of Rajasthan The State Of ... on 24 August, 2016

14. Ex-facie, the argument of learned counsel for the respondents, that since the applicants availed the relaxation in educational qualification and weightage of work experience, so they are not entitled to be considered for appointment, to the post of MTS in general category, is neither tenable, nor the observations of Honble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Madan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, 2012 (5) W.L.C. 253, Honble Kerala High Court in the case of Deepa Vs. Union of India (Kerala)(D.B.)
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1