Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)Section 107 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu vs State Of West Bengal on 11 November, 2009
12. The Apex Court in the case of
AMALENDU PAL V. STATE OF WEST BENGAL3,
has held as follows::
S.S.Chheena vs Vijay Kumar Mahajan & Anr on 12 August, 2010
(Emphasis supplied)
14
Again, the Apex Court in the case of S.S.
CHHEENA V. VIJAY KUMAR MAHAJAN4, has held
as follows:
Gurucharan Singh vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 7 October, 2021
(Emphasis supplied)
The Apex Court in a recent judgment in the
case of GURUCHARAN SINGH v. STATE OF
PUNJAB5 while considering the entire spectrum of
law has held as follows:
M C Chaithra vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008
10. The learned counsel for the petitioner
places reliance on a judgment of the learned Single
Judge of this Court in the case of M.C.CHAITHRA
AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA
reported in ILR 2008 KAR 2710. This judgment is
of the year 2008. The clock of the flow of law did
not freeze in the year 2008, as much water has
flown thereafter in interpretation of Sections 306
and 107 of the IPC by plethora of judgments of the
Apex Court. I therefore, deem it appropriate to, at
the outset, notice such flow of law and then
consider the facts obtaining in the case at hand on
the touch stone of such interpretation by the Apex
8
Court. The Apex Court interpreting Section 306 of
IPC, has in several judgments, held the existence of
mens rea or instigation is necessary to make out an
offence punishable under Section 306 of the IPC.
Kanchan Sharma vs State Of Up And Another on 18 July, 2019
8. Subsequent to the judgment rendered by this Court
in the aforesaid case rendered on 13.09.2021, the Apex Court in
the case of KANCHAN SHARMA V. STATE OF UTTAR
PRADESH AND ANOTHER6 has again reiterated necessary
ingredients to establish an offence under Section 306 of IPC. The
complaint does not narrate any circumstance that had
instigated the father of the complainant to commit suicide by
any act of the petitioners.