Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.40 seconds)

Raghubir Singh & Others Etc vs State Of Bihar on 19 September, 1986

[19] In Raghubir Singh Vs. State of Bihar reported in (1986) 4 SCC 481 the Hon'ble Apex Court laid down the circumstances under which bail granted to an accused can be cancelled. It has been held by the Apex Court in the said judgment that bail granted to an accused can be cancelled where (i) the accused misuses his liberty by indulging in similar criminal activity, (ii) interferes with the course of investigation,
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 437 - O C Reddy - Full Document

Satpal Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 27 March, 2018

[10] It is contended by Mr. Datta, learned P.P that the trial court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner even without making any reference to section 37 of the NDPS Act which is totally illegal and unsustainable. Mr. Datta, learned P.P representing the petitioner has also relied in the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Kerala & Ors. Vs. Rajesh & Ors. reported in (2020) 12 SCC 122 wherein the Apex Court having reiterated the ratio decided in the case of Satpal Singh (Supra) held that the jurisdiction of court to grant bail in a case under the NDPS Act involving commercial quantity is circumscribed by the provisions of section 37 NDPS Act. The Apex Court held that bail cannot be granted to an accused under NDPS Act where B.A No. 63 of 2021 Page - 8 of 14 commercial quantity of contraband is involved without recording the satisfaction of the court that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of such offence and recording of such finding mandated under section 37 NDPS Act is a sine qua non for granting bail to the accused under the NDPS Act. Learned P.P has relied on paragraphs 19,20 and 21 of the said judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court which read as under:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 12 - Cited by 188 - Full Document
1   2 Next