Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.57 seconds)Cit vs Ekl Appliances Ltd on 29 March, 2012
5.14. The assessee has also made a plea that the OECD Guidelines
permit aggregation of all international transactions with the main
activity. Such guidelines, however, are not binding but are merely
elucidative. Moreover, Indian is not a member of OECD. The assessee
has relied upon the order of the Hon'ble Delhi High court in the case
of CIT Vs. EKL Appliances [ITA no. 1068/2011 & 1070/2011). The
Hon'ble High Court has rendered its judgment in a specific situation
only, where the TPO made wholesale disallowance of the expenditure
for the reason that the assessee had suffered continuous losses. This
case, therefore, is not applicable as disallowance has not been made
in this case on account of expense and having been incurred inspite of
continuous losses.
Lufthansa Cargo India Private Ltd. vs Dcit [Alongwith T.D.S. Appeal Nos. 66, ... on 30 June, 2004
In the case of Dresser Rand India Pvt. Ltd. (supra), the assessee
had adopted TNMM as the most appropriate method.
M/S Prashanth Sai Builders,, Hyderabad vs Department Of Income Tax on 11 December, 2013
- SA Builders Ltd. vs CIT: [2007] 288 ITR 1 (SC)
- CIT vs Walchand & Co Ltd: [1967] 65 ITR 381 (SC)
- CIT vs B. Dalmia Cement Ltd.: [2002] 254 ITR 377 (Del)
- CIT vs Oracle India (P) Ltd.: [2011] 199 TAXMAN 181(Delhi)
- McCann Erickson India Private Limited vs ACIT (ITA No.
5871/Del/2011)
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay vs M/S. Walchand & Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., Bombay on 17 March, 1967
- SA Builders Ltd. vs CIT: [2007] 288 ITR 1 (SC)
- CIT vs Walchand & Co Ltd: [1967] 65 ITR 381 (SC)
- CIT vs B. Dalmia Cement Ltd.: [2002] 254 ITR 377 (Del)
- CIT vs Oracle India (P) Ltd.: [2011] 199 TAXMAN 181(Delhi)
- McCann Erickson India Private Limited vs ACIT (ITA No.
5871/Del/2011)
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Dalmia Cement (B.) Ltd. on 4 September, 2001
- SA Builders Ltd. vs CIT: [2007] 288 ITR 1 (SC)
- CIT vs Walchand & Co Ltd: [1967] 65 ITR 381 (SC)
- CIT vs B. Dalmia Cement Ltd.: [2002] 254 ITR 377 (Del)
- CIT vs Oracle India (P) Ltd.: [2011] 199 TAXMAN 181(Delhi)
- McCann Erickson India Private Limited vs ACIT (ITA No.
5871/Del/2011)
Commr.Of Income Tax-V,New Delhi vs M/S Oracle Software India Ltd on 13 January, 2010
- SA Builders Ltd. vs CIT: [2007] 288 ITR 1 (SC)
- CIT vs Walchand & Co Ltd: [1967] 65 ITR 381 (SC)
- CIT vs B. Dalmia Cement Ltd.: [2002] 254 ITR 377 (Del)
- CIT vs Oracle India (P) Ltd.: [2011] 199 TAXMAN 181(Delhi)
- McCann Erickson India Private Limited vs ACIT (ITA No.
5871/Del/2011)
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd. ... on 30 April, 2007
In the case of Indo American Jewellery Ltd. (supra), Hon'ble Bombay
High Court while affirming the ITAT decision has held that there being
uniformity in assessee's act in not charging interest both from AE and non AE
and delay in realization in both the cases is same, , notional interest cannot be
considered with ALP on delayed realization.
Van Oord Acz India (P) Ltd. vs Acit on 30 November, 2007
This has been further followed by
the ITAT in the case of Lintas India P. Ltd. (supra) & Mastek Ltd. (supra).
Badridas Daga vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 25 April, 1958
Advances having become irrecoverable and actually written off are allowable as
bad debt written off, as well as business loss/ expenditure u/s 37(1). Our view is
supported by Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in the case of Badridas Daga
(supra) and Mysore Sugar Co. Ltd. (supra).