Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.58 seconds)Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Smt. Sashi Prabha Devi vs State Of Assam on 3 January, 2006
In the case of Sashi Prabha Devi Vs.
State of Assam [2006-Cri.LJ-1762], the allegation
is that the accused, a Head Mistress of a School
wrongly struck off the name of the deceased from
the Register of the Students in Class X, which
induced the deceased to commit suicide and the
High Court of Gujarat has held that there was no
evidence showing that the accused had acted at
any point of time, suggested or hinted for
commission of suicide and when the accused was
http://www.judis.nic.in
9/12
CRL.O.P.No. 17012 of 2019
entitled to correct any wrong order, as in fact
deceased had not passed her class IX examination,
no case of instigation or abetment of suicide was
made out against the accused.
Netai Dutta vs State Of West Bengal on 28 February, 2005
In the case of Nettai Dutta Vs. State of
will be [2005-2-SCC-659], the Honourable
Supreme Court upholding the order of the High
Court, quashed the charge sheet filed
under Section 306 of IPC on the ground that the
offence under Section would stand only if there is
an abetment for the commission of crime.
Sonti Rama Krishna vs Sonti Shanti Sree & Anr on 28 November, 2008
In a very recent decision rendered in the
case of Sonti Ramakrishna Vs. Sonti Shanthi Shree
and another [2009-1-SCC-554], the Honourable
Supreme Court has held that though normally
threshold interference should not be made
under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure,
quashing of the complaint on facts was just and
necessary. It has also held that words uttered in a
fit of anger or emotion without any intention
cannot be termed as instigation.”
Mahendra Singh vs State Of M.P on 5 April, 2007
http://www.judis.nic.in
5/12
CRL.O.P.No. 17012 of 2019
The Honourable Supreme Court, considering the
definition of abetment under Section 107 of IPC,
found that the charge and conviction of the
accused in the above said case for the offence
under Section 306 of IPC is not sustainable merely
on the allegation of harassment to the deceased.
The Apex Court further held that none of the
ingredients of abetment were attracted on the
statement of the deceased.