Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.28 seconds)
Lakhiram Narandas Bawasadhu vs State Of Gujarat on 27 March, 2002 cites

Bhagwan Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan on 14 August, 1975

He also relied upon another judgement of the Honourable Supreme Court in the matter of Bhagwan Singh vs. The State of Rajasthan reported in 1976 SC 985. He further submitted that following this judgement of the Honourable Supreme Court, the Rajasthan High Court has held in a matter under the NDPS Act that complainant should not proceed with the investigation. The learned Advocate submitted that when it is borne out from the deposition of the Police Station Officer that other Police Sub Inspector of Agthala Police Station was available and normal practice is that when a Police Sub Inspector, who is present in the Police Station, is to be handed over such investigation, there was no reason, for which the Police Inspector, Shri Vyas, should have insisted that the investigation should be assigned to the Police Sub Inspector, Shri Patel, of LCB, Palanpur.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 165 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Nathiya And Anr. vs State Of Rajasthan on 30 January, 1991

The judgement of the Rajasthan High Court in the matter between Nathiya & Anr. vs. The State reported in 1992(1) Crimes 537. It is also important to note that in paragraph 10 of the deposition of the Police Sub Inspector, it is stated that when that Police Sub Inspector had proceeded for training to Ahmedabad, investigation was kept by the Police Inspector, Shri Vyas, with him. This creates a cloud to the effect that these officers were interested to see that at all stages, investigation remains with either the Police Sub Inspector or Police Inspector. Normal rule of prudence is that a complainant should not himself be the investigating officer.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 15 - Cited by 23 - Full Document
1   2 Next