Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.39 seconds)Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Ravi vs Badrinarayan & Ors on 18 February, 2011
In view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble
Apex Court in the case of RAVI Vs. BADRINARAYAN
AND OTHERS (supra), delay in lodging the FIR cannot be a
ground to doubt the claimant's case in genuine cases. The
appreciation of the evidence by the Tribunal is therefore
incomplete and in view of the aforesaid analysis, we are of
the considered opinion that the matter has to be remitted
to the Tribunal for reconsideration of the material evidence
on merits. Yet another reason for our conclusion to remit
the matter is that the Tribunal has not assessed the
disability and compensation payable to the claimant. Even
: 15 :
for this reason, the matter requires to be remitted to the
Tribunal.
Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 337 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 338 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 154 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Mangla Ram vs The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd on 6 April, 2018
Further, the Apex
Court in the case of MANGLA RAM VS. ORIENTAL
INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS reported
: 10 :
in (2018)5 SCC 656 has held that the proceedings under
the Act has to be decided on the basis of preponderance of
probabilities and the claimant is not required to prove the
accident beyond reasonable doubt.
Section 183 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
1