Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (1.66 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 452 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 325 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Tahsildar Singh And Another vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 5 May, 1959
"54. ............It is always the duty of the
Court to separate chaff from the husk and to
dredge the truth from the pandemonium of
statements. It is but natural for human
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.506 of 2009 dt.28-04-2026
32/33
beings to state variant statements due to time
gap but if such statements go to defeat the
core of the prosecution then such
contradictions are material and the Court
has to be mindful of such statements [See:
Tahsildar Singh v. State of U.P., AIR 1959
SC 1012 : 1959 Cri LJ 1231] ."
Bhaskar Sahebrao Late Died Thr Lrs ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 31 January, 2017
34. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bhaskarrao
and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra (supra) has held as under:
L.G. Balakrishnan Brothers Ltd. And ... vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors. on 6 June, 2000
Further reliance is placed on Balakrishnan
and Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu, reported in (2018) 14 SCC 55;
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.506 of 2009 dt.28-04-2026
24/33
AIR 2018 SC 1153, wherein it has been held that minor
contradictions do not affect the core of prosecution case.