Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)

Kum. Madhuri Patil & Anr vs Add1. Commnr., Tribal Development, ... on 28 April, 1997

8. I submit that the case of the petitioner was put before the Scrutiny Committee and the Scrutiny Committee had called the petitioner with his evidences on 15.06.2011. The Scrutiny Committee had taken into account the judgment referred in Madhuri Patil, supra, the certificate produced by the petitioner and the statements made by the petitioner, had given a detailed reasoning as to why the certificate of the petitioner is cancelled, vide order dated 20.06.2011 and therefore, the Scrutiny Committee has not only scrutinized all the evidences and documents produced by the petitioner but also has given detailed reasonings by every observations made by the committee for canceling the caste certificate of the petitioner and therefore, order passed is just and legal and therefore, no interference may be called for by this Hon'ble Court in the documents produced by the petitioner and the petition to the extent deserves to be dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 466 - Full Document
1