Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)

Satish Dhakad vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 December, 2018

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated. According to him, there is no direct or THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No. 8484/2019 (Satish Dhakad Vs. State of M.P.) indirect involvement of the applicant in the said incident. After marriage, deceased and the applicant used to live at Gwalior and the applicant never tortured the deceased in respect of demand of dowry. There is no evidence that the deceased was subjected to cruelty soon before her death. Co-accused Premvati and Raisingh have been released on bail vide orders dated 22/10/18 and 1/2/19 passed in M.Cr.C. Nos. 41295/18 and 4469/2019 respectively and the applicant deserves parity in treatment. He is ready and willing to abide by the conditions which may be imposed by this Court. He is a permanent resident of Gwalior and there is no likelihood of his absconsion if released on bail. With the aforesaid submissions, prayer for grant of bail is made.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1