Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)

P. Purushottam Reddy And Anr. vs Pratap Steels Ltd. on 25 January, 2002

12. The legal preposition regarding remand has been culled out by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.Purushottam Reddy and another Vs. Pratap Steels Ltd. 2002 (2) SCC 686 in para No.10 regarding remand, which reads as under:­ "10. The next question to be examined is the legality and propriety of the order of remand made by the High Court. Prior to the insertion of Rule 23­A in Order 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the CPC Amendment Act 1976, there were only two provisions contemplating remand by a court of appeal in Order 41. Rule 23 applies when the trial court disposes of the entire suit by recording its findings on a preliminary issue without deciding other ::: Downloaded on - 23/03/2022 20:10:17 :::CIS 7 issues and the finding on preliminary issue is reversed in appeal. Rule 25 applies when the appellate court notices an omission on the part of the trial court to frame or try any issue .
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 67 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Singhai Lal Chand Jain(Dead) vs Rashtriya Swayam Sewak Sangh,Panna & ... on 15 February, 1996

decree of the Trial Court and had remanded the case to the Trial Court for decision afresh after giving opportunity to both the parties to adduce evidence on the additional issues framed by the learned Additional District Judge. As referred to above, this is just contrary to the well settled proposition of law and even otherwise it is contrary to the provisions of Order XLI Rule 25 Code of Civil Procedure.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 21 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1