Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.21 seconds)THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972
State Of Madras vs V.G. Row.Union Of India & State ... on 31 March, 1952
(1962) 3 SCR 786 = AIR 1962 SC 316i
Ayyangar, J. who wrote the Judgment observed that though
there were several decisions of this Court in which the
relative criteria were laid down to test the reasonableness
of the restrictions imposed under Clause (6) of Article 19,
the passage from the Judgment of Patanjali Sastri, C.J. in
State of Madras vs. V.G. Row (supra), which we have
already extracted above, was held sufficient for the purpose
of reference.
Article 43 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Amending Act, 1897
The Kerala Industrial Establishments (National And Festival Holidays) Act, 1958
The Collector Of Customs, Madras vs Nathella Sampathu Chetty And ... on 25 September, 1961
Madras
vs. Nathella Sampathu Chetty, AIR 1962 SC 316 = (1962) 3
SCR 786. These decisions were treated as social and
industrial welfare legislation. On the principles of this
philosophy, this Court has already upheld the provisions of
the Industrial Disputes Act in Niemla Textile Finish ins
Mills Ltd. vs. 2nd Punjab Tribunal.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Manohar Lal vs The State Of Punjab on 11 November, 1960
This Article enjoins the State to endeavour to
secure to all workers, be they agricultural, industrial or
otherwise, a living wage and proper conditions of work so as
to assure to them a decent standard of life and full
enjoyment of leisure and social and cultural opportunities.
The idea, therefore, is that the workers would not be
compelled to work on all days. While other employees may
enjoy national and festival holidays, the workers in an
industry or an agricultural farm must work throughout and
should not avail of any holiday is not the philosophy of
Article 43. As human beings they are entitled to a period
of rest which would enable them to fully enjoy their leisure
and participate in social and cultural activities. It was
for this reason that this Court in Manohar Lal vs. State of
Punjab). (1961) 2 SCR 343 = AIR 1961 SC 418, upheld the
compulsory closure of shop on one day.
Ramdhandas And Another vs The State Of Punjab on 10 April, 1961
This decision was
followed in Ramdhandas vs. State of Punjab. (1962) 1 SCR
852 = AIR 1961 SC 1559 upholding the restriction placed on
the opening and closing hours of the shop. Both these
decisions were followed in Collector of Customs,.