Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.21 seconds)
Punjab National Bank vs The Chairman / District Judge on 9 January, 2024 cites

Bar Council Of India vs Union Of India on 3 August, 2012

Provided also that the Central Government, may by notification, increase the limit of ten lakh rupees specified in the second proviso in consultation with the Central Authority.” Bar Council of India challenged the vires of the 2002 Amendment Act by filing petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. One S.N.Pandey also questioned the establishment of Permanent Lok Adalats. The writ petitions were independently dismissed and the constitutionality of Chapter VI-A was upheld [ (2012) 8 SCC 243 (Bar Council of India vs. UOI) & (2012) 8 SCC 261 (S.N.Pandey vs. UOI) ].
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 89 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Brahmdeo Ojha, Kashi Nath Sen, Girija ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 12 September, 2003

Provided also that the Central Government, may by notification, increase the limit of ten lakh rupees specified in the second proviso in consultation with the Central Authority.” Bar Council of India challenged the vires of the 2002 Amendment Act by filing petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. One S.N.Pandey also questioned the establishment of Permanent Lok Adalats. The writ petitions were independently dismissed and the constitutionality of Chapter VI-A was upheld [ (2012) 8 SCC 243 (Bar Council of India vs. UOI) & (2012) 8 SCC 261 (S.N.Pandey vs. UOI) ].
Jharkhand High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 85 - Full Document
1   2 Next