Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.36 seconds)
The Chairman, Bihar Public Service ... vs Pramod Kumar Srivastava And Anr. on 16 April, 2003 cites

Inder Pal Yadav And Ors. Etc vs Union Of India And Ors Etc on 18 April, 1985

10. The Bihar Public Service Commission placing its strong reliance upon two judgments of the Supreme Court in the matter of Inder Pal Yadav v. Union of India Anr., 1985 BLJR 457 and Prahlat Singh and Ors., v. Union of India etc., 1985 PUR 39, submitted that if some people can secure advantage of an order passed by the Court then other similarly placed person should also get the benefit of the said orders of the Court. Sri Jha, learned Counsel shows fairness of the Commission and contends that if the copy is to be re-evaluated in case of one then it should be re-evaluated in case of all. According to him, if all have suffered because of improper evaluation of the answer-books and one person is held entitled to re-evaluation of the answer-books then none should remain unremedied and even if the others are not before this Court, the equity would come into play and all such other copies should be re-evaluated so that no injustice is caused to any candidate.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 749 - D A Desai - Full Document

Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke And Ors. vs Dr. B.S. Mahajan And Ors. on 6 December, 1989

11. So far as the plea of the appellant-Bihar Public Service Commission based on the findings recorded in the matter of Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke v. Dr. B.S. Mahajan, AIR 1990 SC 434, is concerned we must accept the plea that the High Court should not act as an Appellate Authority against the orders passed or the actions taken by the Bihar Public Service Commission. It would also be correct to say that the High Court should not have directed the Bihar Public Service Commission to recommend the case of the petitioner for his appointment in case his marks are found more against last man recommended.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 334 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Abhijit Sen & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 6 December, 1983

20. From the findings recorded by the Division bench of this Court in the matter of Ganesh Prasad Yadav and others (supra) and the judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of Abhijit Sen and others (supra) it would clearly appear that the High Court can interfere in the matter if the 'key-answers' are shown to be wrong. In the present matter, from the records it does not appear nor there was any allegation by the writ petitioner that the 'key-answers' were wrong. In fact, the answer-book has been re-evaluated not on the basis of the 'key-answers' but independent of the 'key-answers'. In the light of these facts, the re-evaluation test is vitiated. Even otherwise we find that present is not a fit matter at this stage where the learned Single Judge should have interfered in the matter.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 48 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document
1