Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.23 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977
34. The learned counsel for the respondents also distinguished the judgment rendered in the case of Mohinder Singh Gill (supra) and Dr. T.P.SenKumar IPS (supra) and has referred to the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of PRP Exports And Others vs. Chief Secretary, government of Tamil Nadu And Others reported in (2014) 13 SCC, 692. In paragraph 8 of the aforesaid judgment the Supreme Court has observed that when larger public interest is involved, the Court can always look into the subsequent events.
Court In The Case Of Secretary, State Of ... vs . Uma on 9 April, 2015
33. The learned counsel for the respondents has argued on the basis of a Constitution Bench judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka vs. Uma Devi & Others reported in (2006) 4 SCC, 01 that if Article 14 and 16 are violated, the Courts would not be a party to uphold such violation. He has referred to paragraph nos. 43, 49 and 50 of the said judgment and argued that the petitioner did not possess the essential qualification for being appointed on the post in question. Her appointment had resulted in discrimination against the candidates who were similarly situated and who did not apply for the post only because they thought that the qualifications mentioned in the Advertisement was sacrosanct. It has also resulted in the denial of right to equal opportunity in public employment.
M/S. Prp Exports vs The Chief Secretary on 2 November, 2012
34. The learned counsel for the respondents also distinguished the judgment rendered in the case of Mohinder Singh Gill (supra) and Dr. T.P.SenKumar IPS (supra) and has referred to the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of PRP Exports And Others vs. Chief Secretary, government of Tamil Nadu And Others reported in (2014) 13 SCC, 692. In paragraph 8 of the aforesaid judgment the Supreme Court has observed that when larger public interest is involved, the Court can always look into the subsequent events.
Chairman, All Railway Rec. Board & Anr vs K. Shyam Kumar & Ors on 6 May, 2010
It has referred to paragraph 45 of the judgment in the case of All India Railway Recruitment Board vs. K. Shyam Kumar reported in (2010) 6 SCC, 614.
Ram Preeti Yadav vs U.P. Board Of High School And ... on 3 September, 2003
35. Learned counsel for the respondents has also referred to the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court relating to fraudulent and erroneous appointments and cancellation of such appointment later on having been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ram Preeti Yadav vs. U.P. Board of High School & Intermediate Education & Others reported in (2003) 8SCC, 311 (Paragraph 10); in the case of Mohd. Sartaj And Another vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in (2006) 2 SCC, 315; in the case of State of Chhattisgarh and others vs. Dhirjo Kumar Sengar reported in (2009) 13 SCC, 600 (Paragraph 12 and 13); in the case of Devendra Kumar vs. State of Uttranchal And Others reported in (2013) 9 SCC, 363; in the case of Khub Ram vs. Dalbir Singh And Another reported in (2015) 8 SCC, 368.
Mohd. Sartaj And Anr vs State Of U.P. And Others on 16 January, 2006
35. Learned counsel for the respondents has also referred to the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court relating to fraudulent and erroneous appointments and cancellation of such appointment later on having been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ram Preeti Yadav vs. U.P. Board of High School & Intermediate Education & Others reported in (2003) 8SCC, 311 (Paragraph 10); in the case of Mohd. Sartaj And Another vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in (2006) 2 SCC, 315; in the case of State of Chhattisgarh and others vs. Dhirjo Kumar Sengar reported in (2009) 13 SCC, 600 (Paragraph 12 and 13); in the case of Devendra Kumar vs. State of Uttranchal And Others reported in (2013) 9 SCC, 363; in the case of Khub Ram vs. Dalbir Singh And Another reported in (2015) 8 SCC, 368.
Khub Ram vs Dalbir Singh & Ors on 29 April, 2015
35. Learned counsel for the respondents has also referred to the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court relating to fraudulent and erroneous appointments and cancellation of such appointment later on having been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ram Preeti Yadav vs. U.P. Board of High School & Intermediate Education & Others reported in (2003) 8SCC, 311 (Paragraph 10); in the case of Mohd. Sartaj And Another vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in (2006) 2 SCC, 315; in the case of State of Chhattisgarh and others vs. Dhirjo Kumar Sengar reported in (2009) 13 SCC, 600 (Paragraph 12 and 13); in the case of Devendra Kumar vs. State of Uttranchal And Others reported in (2013) 9 SCC, 363; in the case of Khub Ram vs. Dalbir Singh And Another reported in (2015) 8 SCC, 368.