Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.29 seconds)Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 202 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Rajasthan vs Kashi Ram on 7 November, 2006
In the case of State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram,
reported at 2006 AIR SCW 5768 [sic: AIR 2007 SC 144], it
was held that accused is duty bound to show as to when he
left the company of the deceased as it was only in the
knowledge of the accused and Section 106 of the Evidence
Act applies in such circumstances.
Ram Gulam Chaudhury And Ors vs State Of Bihar on 25 September, 2001
In the case of Ram Gulam Chaudhary and Ors. v. State
Crl.A.628/2016 Page 23 of 29
of Bihar, reported at (2001) 8 SCC 311 the facts proved at
the trial were that the appellants gave no explanation as to
what they did after they took away the boy. The question
arose whether in such facts Section 106 of the Evidence Act
applied. It was held:
Sahadevan @ Sagadevan vs State Rep. By Inspector Of Police, ... on 1 November, 2002
In the case of Sahadevan alias Sagadevan v. State
represented by Inspector of Police, Chennai, reported at
2003 (1) SCC 534, the prosecution established the fact that
the deceased was seen in the company of the appellants
from the morning of March 5, 1985 till at least 5 p.m. on
that day when he was brought to his house, and thereafter
his dead body was found in the morning of March 6, 1985.
In the background of such facts the Court observed: