Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.34 seconds)Section 2 in The Hindu Women's Rights To Property Act, 1937 [Entire Act]
The Hindu Women's Rights To Property Act, 1937
Section 4 in The Hindu Women's Rights To Property Act, 1937 [Entire Act]
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Section 1 in The Hindu Women's Rights To Property Act, 1937 [Entire Act]
Kanailal Mitra vs Pannasashi Mitra on 21 May, 1954
(3) A similar question came up for consideration before the Calcutta High Court in Kanailal Mitra v. Pannasashi Mitra, .
Section 8 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Minor Ramaiya Konar Alias Ramaswami ... vs Mottayya Mudaliar Alias Manicka ... on 19 January, 1951
In support of this contention, he relies on the Full Bench decision of the Madras High Court in Ramaiya v. Mottayya, . The exact question which is not involved in this case, had come up for consideration before their Lordships. Their Lordships observed:
Surja Kumar Sardar vs Manmatha Nath Naskar And Ors. on 11 July, 1952
Dissenting from an earlier decision of the same High Court, reported in Surja Kumar v. Manmatha Nath, ., which was itself based upon the above said Bombay decision, their Lordships of the Calcutta High Court came to the conclusion that :
1