Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)Section 27A in Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 [Entire Act]
Section 6A in Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Global Education Trust vs State Of Kerala on 10 May, 2022
13. This Court in Global Education Trust (supra) has
categorically held that the mere absence of an order under the
KLU Order does not render such construction illegal.
Accordingly, we are not suggesting that the procedure under
8
WA NO.152 OF 2024 2025:KER:76527
Section 27A of the Paddy Land Act can be dispensed with in all
cases where a KLU Order is obtained. What is being clarified is
that where construction was completed and the land was
already put to lawful use prior to 30.12.2017, and where the
building has been recognised by both the local authority and the
revenue department, Section 27A(1) of the Paddy Land Act has
no application.
The District Collector vs Fr. Jose Uppani on 21 July, 2020
8. Under Rule 12(17) of the Kerala Conservation of
Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008, landowners who had
regularised conversion prior to Section 27A of the Paddy Land
Act, by obtaining orders under Clause 6(2) of the KLU Order,
were liable to pay only 25% of the prescribed fee. However, this
levy was struck down by this Court in District Collector,
Ernakulam and Others v. Fr. Jose Uppani and Others
[2020 (4) KHC 394].
E.P.Shamsudheen vs Muhammad Sufian.V on 13 March, 2023
(i) The power of the Collector cannot be exercised
under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation
Order in respect of the applications filed after
30/12/2017. The applications filed prior to
30/12/2017 will have to be considered for passing
orders under Clause 6(2) of the Land Utilisation
Order in the light of law declared by Division
Bench in Thomas V. J.'s case (supra).
The Revenue Div. Officer Fort Kochi ... vs Jalaja Dileep & Anr on 10 March, 2015
10. The learned Government Pleader, placing reliance on
the above Full Bench judgment and the decision of the Apex
7
WA NO.152 OF 2024 2025:KER:76527
Court in Revenue Divisional Officer, Fort Kochi and Others
v. Jalaja Dileep and Another [2015 (2) KHC 109],
contended that land cannot be re-assessed without following
the procedures prescribed either under the KLU Order or under
Section 27A of the Paddy Land Act, even where the conversion
occurred prior to 2017.
Sukthar Ali vs The State Of Kerala on 25 February, 2015
9. The position of law was subsequently clarified by a
Full Bench in Mukthar Ali v. State of Kerala [2024 (6) KHC
187], which held as follows:
1