Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.29 seconds)Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Union Of India And Anr vs Mohan Pal Etc. Etc on 29 April, 2002
6.2 The learned counsel for the respondents further cited the
judgment of the Apex Court in Union of India Vs Mohan Pal,
2002 (4) SCC 573, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court held
that grant of temporary status was a onetime measure and
was not an ongoing Scheme. Government of India vide OM
SUNITA 2026.04.13
DUTT 16:13:38+05'30'
13 OA No.3645/2016
dated 26.02.2016 reiterated the same position that the
employees who were in position as on 10.09.1993 and fulfilled
the conditions of eligibility were granted temporary status.
The present applicants were not recruited through
employment exchange nor have they fulfilled other eligibility
conditions. Accordingly, the temporary status, which was
granted to them erroneously, was withdrawn. Moreover,
some of the applicants were Group 'D' casual workers and
others were Group 'C' casual workers. The temporary status
was granted only to the Group 'D' employees who fulfilled
required eligibility conditions. Applicant Nos. 2, 3, and 4
were skilled casual workers working as MLD whereas
Applicant No.5 was Skilled Casual worker as Wireman. All
these applicants were in Casual Group 'C' employees.
Temporary status was granted only to casual Group 'D'
employees fulfilling eligibility conditions. These applicants
cannot claim temporary status in Group 'D' when they
worked as Group 'C' casual worker and paid remuneration
accordingly.
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) By ... vs Jagannath (Dead) By L.Rs. And Others on 27 October, 1993
7.4 In S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath, (1994) 1
SCC 1, the Supreme Court emphasized that Courts are meant
to impart justice between parties, and those who come to
court must do so with clean hands. The case highlighted that
individuals attempting to abuse the legal process by
concealing facts should be summarily dismissed from the
proceedings.
Dalip Singh vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 3 December, 2009
7.5 The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dalip Singh (supra) held
that:
G. Narayanaswamy Reddy (Dead) Byl.Rs. ... vs Govt. Of Karnataka And Anr on 29 April, 1991
In G. Narayanaswamy Reddy and others v. Governor of
Karnataka and another AIR 1991 SC 1726, the Court
denied relief to the appellant who had concealed the fact
that the award was not made by the Land Acquisition
Officer within the time specified in Section 11-A of the
Land Acquisition Act because of the stay order passed by
the High Court. While dismissing the special leave
petition, the Court observed:
1