Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.48 seconds)Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Sunil Tyagi vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 28 June, 2021
g. He shall not leave the territory of NCT of Delhi
without due intimation to the investigating officer.
h. The accused shall furnish "annexure B" in view of
Sunil Tyagi Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
[CrlMC5328/18] of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court."
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
P.K. Shaji @ Thammanam Shaji vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2005
In this regard, the Supreme Court
in P.K. Shaji v. State of Kerala1, held as under:
Purushothaman vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 30 October, 2023
10. The aforesaid position has been reiterated by the Supreme Court in
Purushothaman v. State of T.N.3, wherein the Court deprecated the
cancellation of bail without granting the accused an opportunity of
hearing, and observed as under:
Gurdev Singh And Anr. vs State Of Bihar And Anr. on 13 March, 2000
"6. The plea of the appellant's learned counsel is that if the Sessions
Court had granted bail, the order of cancellation of such bail should
also have been passed by the Sessions Court or by any superior court
and not by the learned Magistrate who is not empowered to cancel it.
As a general proposition, the plea raised by the appellant is correct.
It is equally true that the accused who is on bail, should be heard
before an order of cancellation of bail is passed by the Court. This
Court in Gurdev Singh v. State of Bihar [(2005) 13 SCC 286 : AIR
2000 SC 3556 (1) : (2004) 4 Crimes 103] held that the accused must
be given notice and opportunity of hearing before the bail granted to
him is cancelled."2
1