Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.29 seconds)The Cpio, Supreme Court Of India, Tilak ... vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal & Anr. on 2 September, 2009
Further, as far as applicability of Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act is concerned, attention
of the parties is also drawn towards a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India in the matter of Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India
Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal in Civil Appeal No. 10044 of 2010 with Civil
Appeal No. 10045 of 2010 and Civil Appeal No. 2683 of 2010 wherein the import
of "personal information" envisaged under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act has been
exemplified in the context of earlier ratios laid down by the same Court in the
matter(s) of Canara Bank Vs. C.S. Shyam in Civil Appeal No.22 of 2009; Girish
Ramchandra Deshpande vs. Central Information Commissioner & Ors., (2013) 1
SCC 212 and R.K. Jain vs. Union of India & Anr., (2013) 14 SCC 794.The following
was thus held:
Canara Bank vs C.S. Shyam . on 31 August, 2017
Further, as far as applicability of Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act is concerned, attention
of the parties is also drawn towards a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India in the matter of Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India
Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal in Civil Appeal No. 10044 of 2010 with Civil
Appeal No. 10045 of 2010 and Civil Appeal No. 2683 of 2010 wherein the import
of "personal information" envisaged under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act has been
exemplified in the context of earlier ratios laid down by the same Court in the
matter(s) of Canara Bank Vs. C.S. Shyam in Civil Appeal No.22 of 2009; Girish
Ramchandra Deshpande vs. Central Information Commissioner & Ors., (2013) 1
SCC 212 and R.K. Jain vs. Union of India & Anr., (2013) 14 SCC 794.The following
was thus held:
Girish Ramchandra Deshpande vs Cen.Information Commr.& Ors on 3 October, 2012
Further, as far as applicability of Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act is concerned, attention
of the parties is also drawn towards a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India in the matter of Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India
Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal in Civil Appeal No. 10044 of 2010 with Civil
Appeal No. 10045 of 2010 and Civil Appeal No. 2683 of 2010 wherein the import
of "personal information" envisaged under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act has been
exemplified in the context of earlier ratios laid down by the same Court in the
matter(s) of Canara Bank Vs. C.S. Shyam in Civil Appeal No.22 of 2009; Girish
Ramchandra Deshpande vs. Central Information Commissioner & Ors., (2013) 1
SCC 212 and R.K. Jain vs. Union of India & Anr., (2013) 14 SCC 794.The following
was thus held:
Bihar Public Service Commn vs Saiyed Hussain Abbas Rizwi & Anr on 13 December, 2012
In this regard, attention of the Appellant is invited towards a judgement of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 13/12/20012 Bihar Public Service Commission vs.
Sayyed Hussain Abbas Rizvi & Anr [Civil appeal No. 9052 of 2012] wherein the
Apex Court has held that section 8(1)(g) can come into play with any kind of
relationship. It requires that where the disclosure of such information which
would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of
information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security
purpose, the information need not be provided. In other words if in the opinion of
the concerned authority there is danger to life or possibility of danger to physical
safety, the CPIO would be entitled to bring such case within the exemption of
Section 8(1)(g) of the RTI Act. It was further held in para 30 of the decision that:
State(Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) vs Rajinder Prasad Sharma on 2 December, 2014
The aforesaid rationale finds resonance in another judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi
High Court in the matter of Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Rajender Prasad (W.P.[C]
10676/2016) dated 30.11.2017 wherein it was held as under:
Union Of India vs This Review Petition Having Come Up For ... on 26 February, 2014
While, the Apex Court in the matter of Union of India vs Namit Sharma (Review
12
Petition [C] No.2309 of 2012) dated 03.09.2013 observed as under:
Section 12 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Hansi Rawat & Anr. vs Punjab National Bank & Ors. on 11 January, 2013
Further, the issue raised by the Appellant regarding the alleged physical assault
committed against him by SBI officers is purely a matter of grievance which is
outside the scope and mandate of RTI Act. Here, a reference may be had of a
judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the matter of Hansi Rawat and
Anr. v. Punjab National Bank and Ors. (LPA No.785/2012) dated 11.01.2013
wherein it has been held as under:
1