Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)

State Of Punjab vs Dharam Singh on 2 February, 1968

In State of Punjab v. Dharam Singh [1968] 3 SCR 1, a Constitution Bench of this Court held, 83 "Where, as in the present case, the service rules fix a certain period of time beyond which the probationary period cannot be extended, and an employee appointed or promoted to a post on probation is allowed to continue in that post after completion of the maximum period of probation without an express order of confirmation, he cannot be deemed to continue in that post as a probationer by implication. The reason is that such an implication is negatived by the service rule forbidding extension of the probationary period beyond the maximum period fixed by it. In scuh a case, it is permissible to draw the inference that the employee allowed to continue in the post on completion of the maximum period of probation has been confirmed in the post by implication."
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 286 - R S Bachawat - Full Document
1